August 27, 2020

Meet Your Meat

 


The grading of USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) inspected beef is what the average American is concerned with when purchasing beef to eat. Beef steaks, typically the highest, most desirable cuts vary greatly and need to be minimally understood in order to purchase the quality you desire.  There are basically 3 world areas that grade beef:  Australia, Japan and the USA.  Argentina, which exports a significant amount of beef does not typically use the accepted grading methods of the other three producers. Wagyu beef, from Japan, is a very high dollar, and high fat content beef that I won’t get into here. 

For typical USDA beef there are 5 grades, and only three from which you would typically purchase steaks for your grill.  They are Prime, Choice and Select.  There is some variation within these grades, but not officially.  If you see a steak labeled other than prime, choice or select (such as blue ribbon select), it means nothing and is an attempt to get a better price for a standard quality of meat.  There are three basic categories (sometimes listed as 5) below select, but they are not typically for consumption as steaks or roasts.  If they are labeled standard, commercial or utility….don’t buy them to eat.  Typically these grades are for processed (hot dogs) and even dog food.  It does not mean they are bad or dangerous. The USDA inspects them. They are just not suitable for preparing as primary beef presentations.  Much of this beef is from non-beef producing cows, such as dairy breeds or very old animals with extremely low fat percentages.

BMS (beef marbling score) is how beef grades are determined. Though the USDA evaluates and considers a number of factors, such as age of the carcass, bone density, etc, the BMS is the primary focus on grading.  The USDA grades a carcass, not an individual cut of beef.  This grading is done between the 12th and 13th ribs, in the ribeye portion of the carcass.  The intramuscular fat content in that area is what determines the grade of the carcass.

Grass fed beef has become very popular. It is fattened on grass and hay, not grains (mostly corn).  Though there are some good results in terms of flavor and even tenderness, a grass fed steer will not reach a prime grade….hardly ever.  Don’t be fooled here.  Marketing will try and convince you otherwise, but it just isn’t so. Argentinian beef is mostly grass fed in the Pampas region of the country. They are left to grow and fatten on their own, and rarely locked up to “finish” them in a feed lot. That is why the beef is desirable around the world.  I have eaten Argentinian beef on several occasions, and it was very good. It had excellent flavor, but not the “melt in your mouth” tenderness of grain finished USDA prime beef. 

Growing up on a farm/ranch, I was raised on “field to fork” beef. It was not graded, and it was mostly grass fed, with the possibility of grain finishing for a few weeks before slaughter. If you have access to that kind of beef (local producers, etc) and you find it satisfactory, then, by all means, go ahead.  However, don’t think you will be getting a “better” steak in terms of flavor and tenderness. You may get healthier beef, but to get the high end steak house products (such as Ruth’s Chris, etc), you will need to purchase dry aged, prime beef that has been grain finished and graded as such.

Costco and Sam’s usually have one section of Prime cuts.  That is where I look when I want a very good steak.  Choice can be really good, too, but not as consistently as prime. Just a note: if you are buying sirloin or cheaper cuts, don’t get the prime. It isn’t worth the extra cost. Also, if you buy “prime rib,” that is not a grade, it is a cut of beef.  Don’t be fooled. Hope this helps to understand what you get when you are buying beef for the grill. As in most things…get the best you can afford. If you do purchase prime ribeye steaks…PLEASE use salt and pepper only.  Don’t marinade them and hide the A1 sauce. Those are methods of improving choice or select beef.  If anyone asks for ketchup, just SHOOT them. 

August 24, 2020

Former President Barack Obama Addresses The DNC

 

Listening to what was not said in President Barack Obama’s speech to the DNC.

The Obamas entered the White House with a $1.3 million net worth in 2008. That grew to at least $40 million by 2018. The six-figure pension all former presidents receive has significantly contributed to the Obamas' net worth. Today it is at least $70 million. The New York Post recently pegged their fortune much higher, at $135 million.  

Forbes reported that the Obamas spend a significant amount of their money on philanthropy. From 2009 to 2015, they gave $1.1 million to charity.

This does not include Obama's biggest donation to date: his $1.4 million Nobel Peace Prize award in 2009, all of which he donated to multiple charities.  (Business Insider)

So, let’s figure $1.1 million philanthropic giving, plus $1.4 million to various charities, for a total of approximately $2.5 million dollars.  While commendable, it does not exactly mark them as generous philanthropists extraordinaire!   With those dollars, in that timeframe, our (my wife and I) own “charitable giving,” at our current percentage rate of giving which has a 50 year history of consistency, would have been in the neighborhood of 15-20 MILLION DOLLARS…just for perspective from a normal American family.  And if you take out the money President Obama received, and gave away (in and out) for the Nobel Peace Prize, which no one really knows how he won, and was somewhat embarrassed to receive, then you are back down to a bit over a million bucks.  Sounds big, but it is in reality, a pretty paltry sum.

I don’t begrudge Barack and Michelle Obama’s hard work, speaking engagements (some of which were over $400K each), bestsellers, Netflix and future book advancements, etc.  They have capitalized well on their years in the BIG HOUSE. But it reeks to high heaven when he talks about how we need more tax dollar give-away programs, government restrictions and a socialistic run country.  CAPITALISM (not socialism…however you want to define it), with capital letters, is what made him rich beyond belief, and he surely did not mind using its advantages for personal gain. And the amount he has given back is a spit in the ocean.

And then he says in his well delivered speech to the Democratic Convention:  “No one should use their office to enrich themselves…”

Is he the only one who has done this? No…not the point. He is the one who gave the speech. It isn’t a guilty by comparison issue.  His guilt lies in being driven by the same greed and self-serving strategies he is accusing in others. Former President Obama, you did well…you made a fortune from being president…I don’t fault you for that. Just be honest enough to say, “I got filthy RICH as a result of being president of this amazing country and what its capitalistic opportunities presented me.”  

The Gatekeeper